Professional Auditing Research

Professional Auditing Research

Examining the Impact of Auditors' Professional Ethics on Interaction Strategies with Clients (Initial Discussions and Final Negotiations)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohammad Masoudi Moghadam 1
Ghodrat Allah Talebnia 2
1 PhD student of accounting, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/jpar.2025.2049683.1376
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of auditors' professional ethics on interaction strategies with clients, specifically during initial discussions and final negotiations. This research is applied in nature and descriptive-survey in terms of data collection methods. The statistical population consists of all active certified public accountants working in auditing firms that are members of the Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants, totaling 1,879 individuals. The sample size was determined to be 319 individuals using Cochran's formula, and the samples were selected through random sampling for the study. To measure auditors' professional ethics, the Zarefar questionnaire (2016) was utilized, while the interaction strategy with clients was measured using the Kulset and Stuart questionnaire (2018). In assessing the validity and reliability of the research instruments, the overall structure of the questionnaires underwent content validity evaluation. Additionally, reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability, which demonstrated acceptable reliability. The relationships between variables were examined using structural equation modeling methods, employing SPSS 22 and Smart PLS 4 software. The results of the hypothesis tests indicate that auditors' professional ethics significantly impact interaction strategies with clients during initial discussions and final negotiations. Ultimately, the results and recommendations emphasize that professional ethics can serve as a key factor in guiding auditors' interactions with clients in both initial discussions and final negotiations. By implementing these suggestions, it is possible to foster not only better trust and collaboration between the parties but also enhance the quality of auditing and financial reporting. This research in analyzing the effectiveness of auditors' professional ethics on interaction strategies with the client, including initial discussions and final negotiations in Iran's audit environment, provides new perspectives for researchers and can be the basis for future research in this field.
 
Keywords
Auditors' professional ethics
client interaction strategy
initial discussions
final negotiations

Subjects

بادپا، بهروز، امید پورحیدری و احمد خدامی‌پور. (1395). "اثر نگرش‌های حمایتی و آشنایی حسابرس با صاحبکار بر قضاوت اولیه حسابرس و استراتژی جستجوی شواهد". پژوهش‌های کاربردی در گزارشگری مالی، 8(14). 42-7.
پاکدل مجید؛ پورزمانی زهرا(1403) عوامل تعیین کننده رفتار اخلاقی و تجزیه و تحلیل ارزش های اخلاقی حسابداری حرفه ای، نشریه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 13(52)، 215-230.
دریائی، عباسعلی و اکرم عزیزی. (1397). "رابطه اخلاق، تجربه و صلاحیت حرفه‌ای حسابرسان با کیفیت حسابرسی (با توجه به نقش تعدیل‌کننده شک و تردید حرفه‌ای)"، دانش حسابداری مالی، 5(1)، 99-79.
ژولانژاد، فاطمه،  بخردی نسب، وحید . (1401). بررسی نقش اخلاق حسابداران رسمی در مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی شرکت‌ها مبتنی بر تئوری اقتصاد سیاسی. پژوهش‌های حسابرسی حرفه‌ای، 2(6)، 34-54.
سامی، سیامک، خسروی پور، نگار، لشگری، زهرا. (1401). تاثیر کاربرد استعاره دیالتیکی بر فرایند بلوغ مذاکره حسابرسان. مجله دانش حسابرسی، 13(1)، 131-129.
صالحی، تابنده. (1395). "رابطه اخلاق حرفه‌ای حسابرس و کیفیت حسابرسی"، اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، 11(3)، 86-77.
صفرزاده، محمد حسین، مریدی، مجتبی، هوشمند کاشانی، عباس. (1401). تاثیر تعهد خدمت به منافع عمومی و تعهد به اجرای استقلال در کار بر قضاوت اخلاقی: تفاوت در دیدگاه حسابرسان و دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی. پژوهش‌های حسابرسی حرفه‌ای، 2(6), 8-32.
مهرانی، کاوه، یزدانی، بهبهانی نیا، پریسا سادات، اسکندر. (1392). نحوه انتخاب استراتژی‌های مذاکرات با مدیر توسط حسابرس. حسابداری و منافع اجتماعی، 3(1)، 101-122.‎
نمازی، محمد، رجب دری، حسین، روستامیمندی، اعظم. (1396). بررسی تعداد و تحلیل محتوای مقاله های مرتبط با اخلاق حرفه ای حسابداری در ایران، پیشرفت های حسابداری، 9(1)، 193-226.
وزیری، علیرضا، آزادی، کیهان، ملکی چوبری، مجتبی. (1403). عوامل ارزش آفرین در روابط حرفه‌ای بین حسابرس و صاحبکار در حرفه حسابرسی. فصلنامه ارزش آفرینی در مدیریت کسب و کار، 4(2)، 390-411.
Ahmad, H., & Muslim, M. (2023). Negotiating Audit Fees: Strategies for Achieving Fair and Equitable Pricing in Audit Engagements. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(3), 125-134.
Aitkazinov, A. (2023, July). ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN AUDITING. In Publisher. agency: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference «Foundations and Trends in Research»(July 13-14, 2023). Copenhagen, Denmark, 2023. 137p (p. 32). Danish School of Media and Journalism.
Ardelean, Alexandra. (2013). Auditors’ Ethics & their Impact on public Trust. Procedia-Social & Behavioral Sciences 92,10, 55-60.
Asnaashari, H., Safarzadeh, M. H., Kheirollahi, A., & Hashemi, S. (2023). The effect of auditors’ work stress and client participation on audit quality in the COVID-19 era. Journal of Facilities Management.
Babatunde, Mudathir Akanni. Oluwatosin, Ezekiel Oluseun. (2024). Auditor Independence and Audit Quality in Nigerian Banks: Mediating role of Auditor-Client Relationships. Pakistan Journal of Multidisciplinary Innovation, 2(2), 32–45.
Badpa, B. , Pourheidari, O. , & Khodamipour, A. (2019). The Effect of Auditor Advocacy Attitudes and Client Identification on Auditor's Initial Judgment and Search Strategy of Evidence. Applied Research in Financial Reporting, 8(1), 7-42. (in persian)
Bauer, T., Hillison, S. M., & Mokhtar, A. (2024). The influence of client incivility and coping strategies on audit professionals' judgments. Available at SSRN 4542667.
Beattie, V, Fearnley, S, Hines, T. (2014). Auditor–Client Interactions in the Changed UK Regulatory Environment – A Revised Grounded Theory Model, International Journal of Auditing.
Carlisle, M, Gimbar, C, Jenkins, J (2023). Auditor-Client Interactions—An Exploration of Power Dynamics during Audit Evidence Collection. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1 February 2023; 42 (1): 27–51.
Che, L., Myllymäki, E. R., & Svanström, T. (2023). Auditors’ self-assessment of engagement quality and the role of stakeholder priority. Accounting and Business Research, 53(3), 335-375.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Daryayi, A., & Azizi, A. (2019). The relationship between ethics, experience and professional qualification of auditors with auditing quality (accordign to the moderating role of professional skepticism). Journal of financial accounting knowledge, 5(1). (in persian)
Denhere, V., & Moloi, T. (2020). Engagement risk factors related to client acceptance of an engagement: a case of Zimbabwean audit firms. Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research, 22(1), 59-70.
Enofe, A. O. Ukpebor, I. N. N. O. C. E. N. T. & Ogbomo, N. (2015),“The Effect of Accounting ethics in Improving Auditor Professional Skepticism”, International Journal of Advanced Academic Research–Social Sciences and Education, 1(2), PP. 43-58.
Hegazy, M., Hegazy, K., & Eldeeb, M. (2022). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance evaluation in auditing firms. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 37(4), 902-927.
Henseler, J., Christian M. Ringle., Sarstedt ,M.(2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 1, 115–135
Hobson, J., Stern, M,. (2019). The Benefit of Mean Auditors: The Influence of Social Interaction and the Dark Triad on Unjustified Auditor Trust.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Khairunnisa, H., Musyaffi, A. M., Wolor, C. W., & Nasution, H. (2023). Auditors' Competence, Audit Fee, Quality Control, and Audit Quality. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 20(1).
Kline, R.B. 2010, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press, New York.
Kulset, E., & Stuart, I. 2018. Auditor–client negotiations over disputed accounting issues: Evidence from one of the Norwegian Big 4 firms. International Journal of Auditing, 22(3), pp 435-448.
Lenzo, A., (2022). Ethics of Interaction: Levinas and Enactivism on Affectivity, Responsibility, and Signification.
Maresch, D., Aschauer, E. and Fink, M. (2020). Competence trust, goodwill trust and negotiation power in auditor-client relationships, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(2): 335-355. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2017-2865
Mehrani, K, Yazdani, S, Behbahaninia, P, Iskandar, H. (2013). How to choose negotiation strategies with the manager by the auditor. Journal of Accounting and Social Interests, 3(1), 101-122. (in persian)
Namazi M, Rajab Dori H, Rustamimandi A. (2017). "Review of the number and content analysis of articles related to accounting professional ethics in Iran". Journal of Accounting Advances, 9(1): 193-226. (in persian)
Pakdel, M. , & pourzamani, Z. (2024). Factors Determining Ethical Behavior and Analysis of Ethical Values of Professional Accounting. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 13(52), 215-230. (in persian)
RadSaeed, A., Khosravipour, N., & Esmaeilzadeh Magharri, A. (2025). Presenting a model for improving the interaction between the auditor and the client based on grounded theory. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 16(2), 193-208.
Safarzadeh, M. H. , Moridi, M. , & Hooshmand kashani, A. (2022). The Effect of Public Interest Commitment and Independence Commitment on the Ethical Judgment: Differences among Practitioners and Graduate Students. Professional Auditing Research, 2(6), 8-32. (in persian)
Salehi, T. (2016). The Relationship between the Professional Ethics of the Auditor and the Quality of Auditing. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 11(3), 77-86. (in persian)
Sami, S., khosravipour, N., lashgari, Z. (2021). Effect of Dialectical Metaphor of Auditors' Negotiation Maturity Process. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 13(1), pp. 129-131. (in persian)
Sonjaya, Y. (2024). The Influence of Corporate Culture on Audit Practices and Ethics. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 4(2), 107-124.
Teresia, A., & Bernadia Linggar, Y. N. (2022). Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies of Audit Engagement in the Time of Crisis. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis.
Vaziri, A. , Azadi, K. , & Maleki choubari, M. (2024). Value-creating factors in the professional relationship between the auditor and the employer in the auditing profession. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 4(2), 390-411. (in persian)
Zarefar, A.; Andreas, B. & Zarefar, A. (2016). The influence of ethics, experience and  competency toward the quality of auditing with professional auditor skepticism as a moderating variable. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, pp.828-832.
Zholanezhad, F. , & Bekhradi Nasab, V. (2022). Investigating the role of formal accountants ethics in social responsibility of companies based on the theory of political economy. Professional Auditing Research, 2(6), 34-54. (in persian)