احمدیان، عباس.، عبدلی، محمدرضا.، ولیان، حسن. (۱۳۹۹). سنخ‌شناسی الگوهای تفکر حسابرسان در قضاوت‌های حرفه‌ای براساس روش تحلیل کیو، دانش حسابرسی، ۲۰(۷۸): ۱۷۶-۱۴۲
اشرفی، ملیحه.، ولیان، حسن.، عبدلی، محمدرضا. (1401). تحلیل میک‌مک جهت شناخت رویکرد سایکودینامیک درکارکردهای کیفی حسابرسان: تحلیل ماتریس قطبی، دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 11(42): 281-302.
بنی‌مهد، بهمن.، مهرانی، نیوشا. (1401). تاثیر سبک‌های شناخت نوگرا و نوگریز بر تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرس، نشریه پژوهش‌های حسابرسی حرفه‌ای، 2(5): 56-69.
جلالی، رستم. (۱۳۹۱). نمونه‌گیری در پژوهش‌های کیفی، مجله تحقیقات کیفی در علوم سلامت، ۱(۴): ۳۱۰-۳۲۰.
حیدر، مجتبی.، نیکومرام، هاشم. (1398). سبک‌های تفکر و تردید حرفه‌ای در حسابرسی (آزمون نظریه خود حکومتی ذهن)، دو فصلنامه حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، ۳(۵): ۱۸۵-۱۵۱
رنجبر، هادی.، حق‌دوست، علی‌اکبر.، صلصالی، مهوش.، خوشدل، علیرضا.، سلیمانی، محمدعلی.، بهرامی، نسیم. (1391). نمونه‌گیری در پژوهش‌های کیفی: راهنمایی برای شروع، مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران، 3(10): 238-250.
مهدویان‌راد، خداداد.، ذبیحی، علی.، فغانی‌ماکارانی، خسرو. (1400). سبک تفکر و سبک اسنادی حسابرسان مستقل و رابطه آن با سبک تصمیم‌گیری، مطالعات رفتاری در مدیریت، 12(26): 87-103.
نعمتی‌کشتلی، رضا.، حمیدیان، محسن.، جعفری، سیده‌محبوبه.، صراف، مریم. (1399). تأثیر سبک‌های شناختی حسابرسان بر ارزیابی ریسک تقلب (آزمون نظریه انرژیک گریگورک)، دو فصلنامه حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، ۵(۹): ۱-۳۳.
Ahmadian, Abbas, Abdoli, Mohammadreza, Walian, Hassan. (2019). Genealogy of auditors' thinking patterns in professional judgments based on Q analysis method, Danesh Audit, 20(78): 142-176. (In Persian)
Ashrafi, Maleeha., Valian, Hassan., Abdoli, Mohammadreza. (2022). Micmac analysis to understand the psychodynamic approach in the qualitative functions of auditors: polar matrix analysis, Accounting Knowledge and Management Audit, 11(42): 281-302. (In Persian)
Ab Wahid, R. and Tan, P.-L. (2022). QMS external quality auditors’ competency requirements: perspectives from accredited certification bodies in Malaysia, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2021-0127
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research, Qualitative Research, 1(3): 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Bentley, J, W., Lambert, T, A., Wang, E, Y. (2020). The Effect of Increased Audit Disclosure on Managers' Real Operating Decisions: Evidence from Disclosing Critical Audit Matters, The Accounting Review, https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0486
Braun, V, Clarke, V (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Journals, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77-101
Brown, Sh, C., Tenbrink, A, P., LaMarre, G. (2019). Performance while distracted: The effect of cognitive styles and working memory, Personality and Individual Differences, 138(1): 380-384 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.025
Banimahd, Bahman., Mehrani, Nyusha. (2022). The effect of innovative and innovative cognitive styles on the auditor's professional doubt, Journal of Professional Auditing Research, 2(5): 56-69. (In Persian)
Carvalho Júnior, C., Cornacchione, E. B., da Rocha, A., Fábio, R. (2017). Cognitive Brain Mapping of Auditors and Accountants in Going Concern Judgments. Revista de Contabilidade e Finanças, 28(73): 132-147. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2900999
Chen, J., Talha, M. (2021). Audit Data Analysis and Application Based on Correlation Analysis Algorithm, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2(16): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2059432
Cohen, J.A. (2022). The purposeful use of Kolb’s learning styles in online learning design, Development and Learning in Organizations, https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-06-2022-0111
Cools, E., & Van den Broeck, H. (2007) Development and validation of the Cognitive Style Indicator, The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 141(4): 359-387
Cyr, D., Héroux, S. and Fontaine, R. (2020). Auditors’ judgment subordination and the theory of planned behavior, Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(8): 1189-1211. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2018-2110
Du, M, N., Wing, B., Yang, D. (2023). Cross-Cultural Differences in Perceived Control Effectiveness: The Role of Cognition, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 34(2): 49-68. https://doi.org/10.2308/BRIA-2020-057
Eklund, A, R., Aguiar, U, N., Amacher, A. (2021). Design thinking as sensemaking: Developing a pragmatist theory of practice to (re)introduce sensibility, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(1): 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12604
Ferry, L., Hamid, K. and Hebling Dutra, P. (2023). An international comparative study of the audit and accountability arrangements of supreme audit institutions, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2022-0164
Giancola, M., Palmiero, M., Piccardi, L., D’Amico, S. (2022). The Relationships between Cognitive Styles and Creativity: The Role of Field Dependence-Independence on Visual Creative Production, behavioral sciences, 12(2): 212-229. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070212
Giancola, M., Palmiero, M., Piccardi, L., D’Amico, S. (2022). The Relationships between Cognitive Styles and Creativity: The Role of Field Dependence-Independence on Visual Creative Production, behavioral sciences, 12(2): 212-229. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070212
Harvey, O. J., Hunt, D. E., & Schroder, H. M. (1961). Conceptual systems and personality organization.
Henrizi, P., Himmelsbach, D. and Hunziker, S. (2021). Anchoring and adjustment effects on audit judgments: experimental evidence from Switzerland, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4): 598-621.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2020-0011.
Haider, Mojtabi., Nikumram, Hashem. (2018). Thinking styles and professional doubts in auditing (a test of the self-governance theory of the mind), two quarterly journals of value and behavioral accounting, 3(5): 151-185. (In Persian)
Jalali, Rostam. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research, Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 1(4): 310-320. (In Persian)
Jonsen, K. and Jehn, K.A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 4(2): 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391
Kadous, K., Zhou, Y. (2018). How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks? Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1): 108-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12431
Kolb, A, A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manag Learn Edu, 4(2):193-212
Manolis, Ch., Burns, D, J., Assudani, R., Chinta, R. (2013). Assessing experiential learning styles: A methodological reconstruction and validation of the Kolb Learning Style Inventory, Learning and Individual Differences, 23(2): 44-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.009.
Mahdovianrad, Khodadad., Zabihi, Ali., Faghani Makarani, Khosro. (2021). Thinking style and documentation style of independent auditors and its relationship with decision-making style, Behavioral Studies in Management, 12(26): 87-103. (In Persian)
Nematikashtali, Reza., Hamidian, Mohsen., Jafari, Sayedeh Mahboboh., Saraf, Maryam. (2019). The effect of auditors' cognitive styles on fraud risk assessment (testing Grigorek's energetic theory), Value and Behavioral Accounting Quarterly, 5(9): 1-33. (In Persian)
Nagirikandalage, P., Binsardi, A. and Kooli, K. (2022). Audit sampling strategies and frauds: evidence from Africa, Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(1): 170-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2020-2695
Nguyen, H.T.L. (2021). A conceptual framework for wisdom-based decision-making process in audit profession, Library Hi Tech, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2020-0256
Noordin, N, A., Hussainey, kh., Hayek, A, F. (2022). The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Audit Quality: An Analysis from the Perspectives of External Auditors in the UAE, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(8): 339-369. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080339
Northcutt, N., McCoy, D. (2004). Interactive Qualitative Analysis: A Systems Method for Qualitative Research, US: Sage.
Olsen, C., Gold, A. (2018). Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional Skepticism. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006
Plant, K., K. Barac, and H. De Jager. (2017). Developing early career professional auditors at work: what are the Determinants of success? Meditari Accountancy Research, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2017-0119
Rashid, M., Khan, N.U., Riaz, U. and Burton, B. (2023). Auditors' perspectives on financial fraud in Pakistan – audacity and the need for legitimacy, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(1): 167-194.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-04-2021-0135
Ranjbar, Hadi., Haqdoost, Aliakbar., Salsali, Mahosh., Khushdel, Alireza., Soleimani, Mohammad Ali., Bahrami, Nasim. (2011). Sampling in qualitative research: a guide to getting started, Journal of the University of Medical Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army, 3(10): 238-250. (In Persian)
Rayner, S., and R. Riding. (1997). Towards a Categorization of Cognitive Styles and learning Styles. Educational Psychology 17(1/2): 5-27.
Schroder HM, Driver M.J, Streufert S. (1976). Human Information Processing: Individuals and Groups Functioning in Complex Social Situations. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston Inc.
Smit, Ch. (2022). The role of audit styles in financial statement comparability: South African evidence, International Journal of Auditing, 26(4): 572-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12296
Sternberg, R. J., and E. L. Grigorenko. (1997). Are Cognitive Style Still in Style? American Psychologist 52(7): 700-712.
Stice, D., Stice, H. and White, R. (2022). The effect of individual auditor quality on audit outcomes: opening the black box of audit quality, Managerial Auditing Journal https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2021-3235
Suyono, E. and Farooque, O.A. (2019). Auditors’ professionalism and factors affecting it: insights from Indonesia, Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(4): 543-558. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-03-2018-0073
Tiron-Tudor, A. and Deliu, D. (2022). Reflections on the human-algorithm complex duality perspectives in the auditing process, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 19(3): 255-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-04-2021-0059
Wastell, D. G. (2001). Barriers to effective knowledge management: Action research meets grounded theory. Journal of Systems&Information Technology, 5(2): 21–35
Wolfe, Ch, J., Christensen, B, E., Vanderveld, S, D. (2019). Intuition versus Analytical Thinking and Impairment Testing, Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(3): 1598-1621. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12568
Yuan, H., Lu, K., Yang, C., Hao, N. (2021). Examples facilitate divergent thinking: The effects of timing and quality, Consciousness and Cognition, 93(2): 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103169
)